How do you score candidates fairly?

Agree the factors and weights before any interview. Each interviewer scores alone against the same rows. Compare totals, then discuss the rows where scores differ most.

What if two candidates tie?

A tie says either hire is defensible. Look at the rows that separate them and ask which strength the team is shorter on today.

Which candidate should we hire?

Hiring panels stall on finalists who are each strong in a different way. One has the experience, one gave the best interview, one fits the budget. The debate turns on whoever argues hardest in the room.

A weighted scoring matrix is the standard fix, and it is what structured interviewing relies on. The panel agrees the factors and weights before anyone is interviewed. Each person scores alone. The totals start the conversation instead of ending it.

Open the tool with this question filled in. Two to five minutes, no account.

Start this decision

What should you weigh?

Five factors cover most versions of this decision. Rename them, drop the ones that do not apply, and add your own. Phrase each so a higher score is always better.

Skills for the role: The two or three things this person must do well from month one.
How they work with others: Evidence from the interview: how they handle disagreement, how they explain things.
Growth potential: How far they could grow in two years.
Relevant experience: Years doing this kind of work, as distinct from years in total.
Salary within budget: How comfortably their ask fits the band.

What does it look like worked out?

Three finalists: a senior hire, the candidate who interviewed best, and a junior with a steep learning curve. Weights run 1 to 10, scores 1 to 5.

Worked decision matrix for: Which candidate should we hire?
Factor	Weight	Senior hire	Strong interviewer	Rising junior
Skills for the role	9	5	4	3
How they work with others	7	3	5	4
Growth potential	5	2	4	5
Relevant experience	4	5	3	2
Salary within budget	3	2	3	5
Total		102	112	103

Each total is score times weight, added down the column.

Strong interviewer wins by 9 points. The strong interviewer wins, and the senior hire comes in close behind the junior. That is worth a second look: if the team needs someone who can work alone from day one, experience deserves more weight than this panel gave it.

Change the weight on relevant experience from 4 to 10, keep every score the same, and Senior hire wins instead, 132 to 130. The options did not change. One judgement about what matters did.

Where do people go wrong?

Scoring together. When one interviewer says a number out loud, the rest anchor to it. Score independently, then compare where you disagree.

Setting weights after the interviews. Once you have a favourite, you will weight what they are good at. Agree the rows and weights before the first CV is read.

Using "culture fit" as a row. It is vague enough to hide bias. Replace it with behaviour you can point to, such as how they handle feedback.

Common questions

How do you score candidates fairly?: Agree the factors and weights before any interview. Each interviewer scores alone against the same rows. Compare totals, then discuss the rows where scores differ most.
What if two candidates tie?: A tie says either hire is defensible. Look at the rows that separate them and ask which strength the team is shorter on today.

Ready to weigh your own?

The question and starter options come filled in. Change anything. AI suggests factors; the answer comes only from your weights and scores.

Start this decision